This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
hrtimer: Prevent hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram race
to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
hrtimer-prevent-hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram-race.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From b22affe0aef429d657bc6505aacb1c569340ddd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leonid Shatz <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:33:37 +0200
Subject: hrtimer: Prevent hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram race
From: Leonid Shatz <[email protected]>
commit b22affe0aef429d657bc6505aacb1c569340ddd2 upstream.
hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram contains a race which could result in
timer.base switch during unlock/lock sequence.
hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram is releasing the lock protecting the timer
base for calling raise_softirq_irqsoff() due to a lock ordering issue
versus rq->lock.
If during that time another CPU calls __hrtimer_start_range_ns() on
the same hrtimer, the timer base might switch, before the current CPU
can lock base->lock again and therefor the unlock_timer_base() call
will unlock the wrong lock.
[ tglx: Added comment and massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Leonid Shatz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Izik Eidus <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -640,21 +640,9 @@ static inline void hrtimer_init_hres(str
* and expiry check is done in the hrtimer_interrupt or in the softirq.
*/
static inline int hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer,
- struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
- int wakeup)
+ struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)
{
- if (base->cpu_base->hres_active && hrtimer_reprogram(timer, base)) {
- if (wakeup) {
- raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
- raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
- raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
- } else
- __raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
-
- return 1;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return base->cpu_base->hres_active && hrtimer_reprogram(timer, base);
}
static inline ktime_t hrtimer_update_base(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base)
@@ -735,8 +723,7 @@ static inline int hrtimer_switch_to_hres
static inline void
hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base, int skip_equal) { }
static inline int hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer,
- struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
- int wakeup)
+ struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -995,8 +982,21 @@ int __hrtimer_start_range_ns(struct hrti
*
* XXX send_remote_softirq() ?
*/
- if (leftmost && new_base->cpu_base == &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases))
- hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(timer, new_base, wakeup);
+ if (leftmost && new_base->cpu_base == &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases)
+ && hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram(timer, new_base)) {
+ if (wakeup) {
+ /*
+ * We need to drop cpu_base->lock to avoid a
+ * lock ordering issue vs. rq->lock.
+ */
+ raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ __raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
+ }
+ }
unlock_hrtimer_base(timer, &flags);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from
[email protected] are
queue-3.0/hrtimer-prevent-hrtimer_enqueue_reprogram-race.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
