This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
svcrpc-make-svc_age_temp_xprts-enqueue-under-sv_lock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From e75bafbff2270993926abcc31358361db74a9bc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:33:48 -0500
Subject: svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@redhat.com>
commit e75bafbff2270993926abcc31358361db74a9bc2 upstream.
svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list. Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.
I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)
Tested-by: Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu>
Tested-by: PaweÅ Sikora <pawel.sik...@agmk.net>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -824,7 +824,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned
struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure;
struct svc_xprt *xprt;
struct list_head *le, *next;
- LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged);
dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n");
@@ -845,25 +844,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned
if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 ||
test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags))
continue;
- svc_xprt_get(xprt);
- list_move(le, &to_be_aged);
+ list_del_init(le);
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags);
- }
- spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
-
- while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) {
- le = to_be_aged.next;
- /* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */
- list_del_init(le);
- xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list);
-
dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt);
/* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */
svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
- svc_xprt_put(xprt);
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bfie...@redhat.com are
queue-3.0/svcrpc-make-svc_age_temp_xprts-enqueue-under-sv_lock.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
