This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xen/arm: actually pass a non-NULL percpu pointer to request_percpu_irq

to the 3.8-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xen-arm-actually-pass-a-non-null-percpu-pointer-to-request_percpu_irq.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 2798ba7d19aed645663398a21ec4006bfdbb1ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:53:09 +0000
Subject: xen/arm: actually pass a non-NULL percpu pointer to request_percpu_irq

From: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>

commit 2798ba7d19aed645663398a21ec4006bfdbb1ef3 upstream.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int __init xen_init_events(void)
        xen_init_IRQ();
 
        if (request_percpu_irq(xen_events_irq, xen_arm_callback,
-                       "events", xen_vcpu)) {
+                       "events", &xen_vcpu)) {
                pr_err("Error requesting IRQ %d\n", xen_events_irq);
                return -EINVAL;
        }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from 
[email protected] are

queue-3.8/xen-arm-actually-pass-a-non-null-percpu-pointer-to-request_percpu_irq.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to