This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cifs: only set ops for inodes in I_NEW state

to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cifs-only-set-ops-for-inodes-in-i_new-state.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From c2b93e0699723700f886ce17bb65ffd771195a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:28:31 -0400
Subject: cifs: only set ops for inodes in I_NEW state

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

commit c2b93e0699723700f886ce17bb65ffd771195a6d upstream.

It's generally not safe to reset the inode ops once they've been set. In
the case where the inode was originally thought to be a directory and
then later found to be a DFS referral, this can lead to an oops when we
try to trigger an inode op on it after changing the ops to the blank
referral operations.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/cifs/inode.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ cifs_fattr_to_inode(struct inode *inode,
 
        if (fattr->cf_flags & CIFS_FATTR_DFS_REFERRAL)
                inode->i_flags |= S_AUTOMOUNT;
-       cifs_set_ops(inode);
+       if (inode->i_state & I_NEW)
+               cifs_set_ops(inode);
 }
 
 void


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.0/cifs-only-set-ops-for-inodes-in-i_new-state.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to