This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/pci: Implement IRQ functions if !PCI
to the 3.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-pci-implement-irq-functions-if-pci.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From c46b54f7406780ec4cf9c9124d1cfb777674dc70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:34:04 +0200
Subject: s390/pci: Implement IRQ functions if !PCI
From: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
commit c46b54f7406780ec4cf9c9124d1cfb777674dc70 upstream.
All architectures must implement IRQ functions. Since various
dependencies on !S390 were removed, there are various drivers that can
be selected but will fail to link. Provide a dummy implementation of
these functions for the !PCI case.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/kernel/irq.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 33 -------------------------
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -313,3 +313,67 @@ void measurement_alert_subclass_unregist
spin_unlock(&ma_subclass_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(measurement_alert_subclass_unregister);
+
+void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ /*
+ * Not needed, the handler is protected by a lock and IRQs that occur
+ * after the handler is deleted are just NOPs.
+ */
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_irq);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_PCI
+
+/* Only PCI devices have dynamically-defined IRQ handlers */
+
+int request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
+ unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_irq);
+
+void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(free_irq);
+
+void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_irq);
+
+void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq);
+
+#endif /* !CONFIG_PCI */
+
+void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ disable_irq(irq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq_nosync);
+
+unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_on);
+
+int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_off);
+
+unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val)
+{
+ return val;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_mask);
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
@@ -306,15 +306,6 @@ static int zpci_cfg_store(struct zpci_de
return rc;
}
-void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- /*
- * Not needed, the handler is protected by a lock and IRQs that occur
- * after the handler is deleted are just NOPs.
- */
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_irq);
-
void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
@@ -331,30 +322,6 @@ void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq);
-void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq)
-{
- disable_irq(irq);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq_nosync);
-
-unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_on);
-
-int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_off);
-
-unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val)
-{
- return val;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_mask);
-
void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-3.9/s390-pci-implement-irq-functions-if-pci.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
