The patch below does not apply to the 3.0-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 10d0b9030a3f86e1e26c710c7580524d7787d688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:25:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: Fix duplicate if test

A typo causes routine rtl92cu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower() to test the
same condition twice. The problem was found using cppcheck-1.49, and the
proper fix was verified against the pre-mac80211 version of the code.

This patch was originally included as commit 1288aa4, but was accidentally
reverted in a later patch.

Reported-by: David Binderman <[email protected]> [original report]
Reported-by: Andrea Morello <[email protected]> [report of accidental 
reversion]
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Cc: stable <[email protected]>  [back to 2.6.39]
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
index 953f1a0..2119313 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/rf.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void rtl92cu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower(struct ieee80211_hw 
*hw,
                        tx_agc[RF90_PATH_A] = 0x10101010;
                        tx_agc[RF90_PATH_B] = 0x10101010;
                } else if (rtlpriv->dm.dynamic_txhighpower_lvl ==
-                          TXHIGHPWRLEVEL_LEVEL1) {
+                          TXHIGHPWRLEVEL_LEVEL2) {
                        tx_agc[RF90_PATH_A] = 0x00000000;
                        tx_agc[RF90_PATH_B] = 0x00000000;
                } else{

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to