The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 3.10-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <[email protected]> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 30a9f0b251285ba29f09a7134eee07a4c3aca639 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:32:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] parisc: more capabilities info in /proc/cpuinfo Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.10 diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c index c8fb61e..8a96c8a 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c @@ -371,10 +371,23 @@ show_cpuinfo (struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "capabilities\t:"); if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_OS32) - seq_printf(m, " os32"); + seq_puts(m, " os32"); if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_OS64) - seq_printf(m, " os64"); - seq_printf(m, "\n"); + seq_puts(m, " os64"); + if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_IOPDIR_FDC) + seq_puts(m, " iopdir_fdc"); + switch (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_NVA_MASK) { + case PDC_MODEL_NVA_SUPPORTED: + seq_puts(m, " nva_supported"); + break; + case PDC_MODEL_NVA_SLOW: + seq_puts(m, " nva_slow"); + break; + case PDC_MODEL_NVA_UNSUPPORTED: + seq_puts(m, " needs_equivalent_aliasing"); + break; + } + seq_printf(m, " (0x%02lx)\n", boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities); seq_printf(m, "model\t\t: %s\n" "model name\t: %s\n", -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
