Subject: + memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications.patch added to -mm 
tree
To: 
[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:04:26 -0700


The patch titled
     Subject: memcg: fix multiple large threshold notifications
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications.patch
and later at
    
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>
Subject: memcg: fix multiple large threshold notifications

A memory cgroup with (1) multiple threshold notifications and (2) at least
one threshold >=2G was not reliable.  Specifically the notifications would
either not fire or would not fire in the proper order.

The __mem_cgroup_threshold() signaling logic depends on keeping 64 bit
thresholds in sorted order.  mem_cgroup_usage_register_event() sorts them
with compare_thresholds(), which returns the difference of two 64 bit
thresholds as an int.  If the difference is positive but has bit[31] set,
then sort() treats the difference as negative and breaks sort order.

This fix compares the two arbitrary 64 bit thresholds returning the
classic -1, 0, 1 result.

The test below sets two notifications (at 0x1000 and 0x81001000):
  cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
  mkdir x
  for x in 4096 2164264960; do
    cgroup_event_listener x/memory.usage_in_bytes $x | sed "s/^/$x listener:/" &
  done
  echo $$ > x/cgroup.procs
  anon_leaker 500M

v3.11-rc7 fails to signal the 4096 event listener:
  Leaking...
  Done leaking pages.

Patched v3.11-rc7 properly notifies:
  Leaking...
  4096 listener:2013:8:31:14:13:36
  Done leaking pages.

The fixed bug is old.  It appears to date back to the introduction of
memcg threshold notifications in v2.6.34-rc1-116-g2e72b6347c94 "memcg:
implement memory thresholds"

Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications 
mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5591,7 +5591,13 @@ static int compare_thresholds(const void
        const struct mem_cgroup_threshold *_a = a;
        const struct mem_cgroup_threshold *_b = b;
 
-       return _a->threshold - _b->threshold;
+       if (_a->threshold > _b->threshold)
+               return 1;
+
+       if (_a->threshold < _b->threshold)
+               return -1;
+
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int mem_cgroup_oom_notify_cb(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

memcg-fix-multiple-large-threshold-notifications.patch
memcg-vmscan-integrate-soft-reclaim-tighter-with-zone-shrinking-code.patch
memcg-get-rid-of-soft-limit-tree-infrastructure.patch
vmscan-memcg-do-softlimit-reclaim-also-for-targeted-reclaim.patch
memcg-enhance-memcg-iterator-to-support-predicates.patch
memcg-track-children-in-soft-limit-excess-to-improve-soft-limit.patch
memcg-vmscan-do-not-attempt-soft-limit-reclaim-if-it-would-not-scan-anything.patch
memcg-track-all-children-over-limit-in-the-root.patch
memcg-vmscan-do-not-fall-into-reclaim-all-pass-too-quickly.patch
memcg-remove-memcg_nr_file_mapped.patch
memcg-check-for-proper-lock-held-in-mem_cgroup_update_page_stat.patch
memcg-add-per-cgroup-writeback-pages-accounting.patch
memcg-document-cgroup-dirty-writeback-memory-statistics.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to