On 2013/11/18 14:48, Fan Du wrote: > > > On 2013年11月18日 14:42, Zhao Hongjiang wrote: >> On 2013/11/18 14:36, Fan Du wrote: >>> Hi, HongJiang >>> >>> On 2013年11月18日 14:25, Zhao Hongjiang wrote: >>>> Hi, Fan or Andrew, >>>> >>>> 74e3d1e17b2e11d175970b85acd44f5927000ba2 >>>> include/linux/fs.h: disable preempt when acquire i_size_seqcount write lock >>>> >>>> >>>> This looks applicable to stable-3.4, that fix a lockup while two rt tasks >>>> bind to one CPU core. It was built successful for me. What do you think? >>> >>> I don't see any stable tree tagged as "stable-3.4", do you mean the >>> "longterm 3.4.69"? >> >> Yes! I mean the longterm 3.4.69. > > It should be integrated into longterm 3.4.69, but usually the author of this > fix is expected > to request for stable tree only, I'm not familiar with the longterm tree > maintenance procedure. > > I cannot help you with this, maybe Andrew will clarify your request. >
Yes you can. A longterm stable tree is a stable tree. As you're the author of this patch, if you agree it fits for 3.4, Greg will do the remaining work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
