This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xfrm: Release dst if this dst is improper for vti tunnel

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xfrm-release-dst-if-this-dst-is-improper-for-vti-tunnel.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 11f81df10453542ec8928675d24cbd94c7c774af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "fan.du" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:53:28 +0800
Subject: xfrm: Release dst if this dst is improper for vti tunnel

From: "fan.du" <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 236c9f84868534c718b6889aa624de64763281f9 ]

After searching rt by the vti tunnel dst/src parameter,
if this rt has neither attached to any transformation
nor the transformation is not tunnel oriented, this rt
should be released back to ip layer.

otherwise causing dst memory leakage.

Signed-off-by: Fan Du <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_vti.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vti_tunnel_xmit(struc
        if (!rt->dst.xfrm ||
            rt->dst.xfrm->props.mode != XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) {
                dev->stats.tx_carrier_errors++;
+               ip_rt_put(rt);
                goto tx_error_icmp;
        }
        tdev = rt->dst.dev;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.10/xfrm-release-dst-if-this-dst-is-improper-for-vti-tunnel.patch
queue-3.10/pktgen-xfrm-update-ipv4-header-total-len-and-checksum-after-tranformation.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to