On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:17:15AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > A number of NUMA balancing patches were tagged for -stable but I got a > > > number of rejected mails from either Greg or his robot minion. The list > > > of relevant patches is > > > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: serialise parallel get_user_page against > > > THP" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: call MMU notifiers on THP migration" > > > MERGED: Patch "mm: clear pmd_numa before invalidating" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: do not clear PMD during PTE update scan" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: do not clear PTE for pte_numa update" > > > MERGED: Patch "mm: numa: ensure anon_vma is locked to prevent parallel > > > THP splits" > > > MERGED: Patch "mm: numa: avoid unnecessary work on the failure path" > > > MERGED: Patch "sched: numa: skip inaccessible VMAs" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: clear numa hinting information on > > > mprotect" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: avoid unnecessary disruption of NUMA > > > hinting during" > > > Patch "mm: fix TLB flush race between migration, and > > > change_protection_range" > > > Patch "mm: numa: guarantee that tlb_flush_pending updates are visible > > > before page table updates" > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: defer TLB flush for THP migration as > > > long as" > > > > > > Fixing the rejects one at a time may cause other conflicts due to ordering > > > issues. Instead, this patch series against 3.12.6 is the full list of > > > backported patches in the expected order. Greg, unfortunately this means > > > you may have to drop some patches already in your stable tree and reapply > > > but on the plus side they should be then in the correct order for > > > bisection > > > purposes and you'll know I've tested this combination of patches. > > > > Many thanks for these, I'll go queue them up in a bit and drop the > > others to ensure I got all of this correct. > > Ok, I've now queued all of these up, in this order, so we should be > good. > > I'll do a -rc2 in a bit as it needs some testing. >
Thanks a million. I should be cc'd on some of those so I'll pick up the final result and run it through the same tests just to be sure. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
