From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

This patch does NOT apply to the 3.12 stable tree. If you still want
it applied, please provide a backport.

===============

commit 177c53d943368fc97644ebc0a250dc8e2d124250 upstream.

We must use smp_call_function_single(.wait=1) for the
irq_cpu_stop_queue_work() to ensure the queueing is actually done under
stop_cpus_lock. Without this we could have dropped the lock by the time
we do the queueing and get the race we tried to fix.

Fixes: 7053ea1a34fa ("stop_machine: Fix race between stop_two_cpus() and 
stop_cpus()")

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/stop_machine.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 84571e09c907..01fbae5b97b7 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ int stop_two_cpus(unsigned int cpu1, unsigned int cpu2, 
cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *
         */
        smp_call_function_single(min(cpu1, cpu2),
                                 &irq_cpu_stop_queue_work,
-                                &call_args, 0);
+                                &call_args, 1);
        lg_local_unlock(&stop_cpus_lock);
        preempt_enable();
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to