From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>

The current code assumes a one-to-one lockowner<->lock stateid
correspondance.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 89e4240..9a77a5a 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4166,6 +4166,10 @@ static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nfs4_lockowner 
*lo, struct inode *inode, c
 
        if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
                return false;
+       if (list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+               return false;
+       }
        lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
                               struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
        return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to