This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ipv4: return valid RTA_IIF on ip route get

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ipv4-return-valid-rta_iif-on-ip-route-get.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed May 28 20:43:09 PDT 2014
From: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 18:08:02 +0300
Subject: ipv4: return valid RTA_IIF on ip route get

From: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 91146153da2feab18efab2e13b0945b6bb704ded ]

Extend commit 13378cad02afc2adc6c0e07fca03903c7ada0b37
("ipv4: Change rt->rt_iif encoding.") from 3.6 to return valid
RTA_IIF on 'ip route get ... iif DEVICE' instead of rt_iif 0
which is displayed as 'iif *'.

inet_iif is not appropriate to use because skb_iif is not set.
Use the skb->dev->ifindex instead.

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ static int rt_fill_info(struct net *net,
                        }
                } else
 #endif
-                       if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, rt->rt_iif))
+                       if (nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, skb->dev->ifindex))
                                goto nla_put_failure;
        }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.10/ipv4-return-valid-rta_iif-on-ip-route-get.patch
queue-3.10/sctp-reset-flowi4_oif-parameter-on-route-lookup.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to