On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 06:56:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:04:17PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:14:58PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:58:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Daniel Kiper <[email protected]> > > > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:46:20 +0200 > > > > > > > > > From: Matt Wilson <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > Sometimes it is useful to be able to change the MAC address of the > > > > > interface for netback devices. For example, when using ebtables it may > > > > > be useful to be able to distinguish traffic from different interfaces > > > > > without depending on the interface name. > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Nikita Borzykh <[email protected]> > > > > > Reported-by: Paul Harvey <[email protected]> > > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> > > > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Wilson <[email protected]> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> > > > > > (cherry picked from commit 4a633a602c26497b8285a202830829d3be007c7b) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <[email protected]> > > > > > Tested-by: Daniel Kiper <[email protected]> > > > > > Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > I don't think this is suitable for -stable. > > > > > > > > -stable should be restricted bug fixes for things that either > > > > are extremely serious, or hit a very huge segment of the user > > > > base. > > > > > > > > This issue does not quality for either condition. > > > > > > Yeah, it seems like a new feature to me, I'll drop it from my to-apply > > > queue. > > > > Yes, in fact it is, however, without it toolstack pollute > > /var/log/xen/xen-hotplug.log > > with "RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported" error when every domain > > is started. > > Additionally, it is simple two liner and it should not break anything > > (Konrad and > > I did some tests and everything looks OK). I do not mention that from time > > to time > > we add some features like support for new hardware with just new device ID > > (e.g. > > USB devices). So that is why I decided to post this patch to stable. > > New device ids and quirks to existing drivers are valid stable patches > (see Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt), but new features usually > are not.
There is something like that: - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something critical. I think that this is "oh, that's not good" issue type. Of course it is not so critical but a bit annoying. Hence, could we have it in 3.4 or "NO" is your the last word in that case? Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
