Subject: [merged] 
idr-fix-overflow-bug-during-maximum-id-calculation-at-maximum-height.patch 
removed from -mm tree
To: 
[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:34:57 -0700


The patch titled
     Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum 
height
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     idr-fix-overflow-bug-during-maximum-id-calculation-at-maximum-height.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Subject: idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height

idr_replace() open-codes the logic to calculate the maximum valid ID given
the height of the idr tree; unfortunately, the open-coded logic doesn't
account for the fact that the top layer may have unused slots and
over-shifts the limit to zero when the tree is at its maximum height.

The following test code shows it fails to replace the value for
id=((1<<27)+42):

static void test5(void)
{
        int id;
        DEFINE_IDR(test_idr);
#define TEST5_START ((1<<27)+42) /* use the highest layer */

        printk(KERN_INFO "Start test5\n");
        id = idr_alloc(&test_idr, (void *)1, TEST5_START, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
        BUG_ON(id != TEST5_START);
        TEST_BUG_ON(idr_replace(&test_idr, (void *)2, TEST5_START) != (void 
*)1);
        idr_destroy(&test_idr);
        printk(KERN_INFO "End of test5\n");
}

Fix the bug by using idr_max() which correctly takes into account the
maximum allowed shift.

sub_alloc() shares the same problem and may incorrectly fail with -EAGAIN;
however, this bug doesn't affect correct operation because
idr_get_empty_slot(), which already uses idr_max(), retries with the
increased @id in such cases.

[[email protected]: Updated patch description.]
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 lib/idr.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
lib/idr.c~idr-fix-overflow-bug-during-maximum-id-calculation-at-maximum-height 
lib/idr.c
--- 
a/lib/idr.c~idr-fix-overflow-bug-during-maximum-id-calculation-at-maximum-height
+++ a/lib/idr.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int sub_alloc(struct idr *idp, in
                        id = (id | ((1 << (IDR_BITS * l)) - 1)) + 1;
 
                        /* if already at the top layer, we need to grow */
-                       if (id >= 1 << (idp->layers * IDR_BITS)) {
+                       if (id > idr_max(idp->layers)) {
                                *starting_id = id;
                                return -EAGAIN;
                        }
@@ -811,12 +811,10 @@ void *idr_replace(struct idr *idp, void
        if (!p)
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-       n = (p->layer+1) * IDR_BITS;
-
-       if (id >= (1 << n))
+       if (id > idr_max(p->layer + 1))
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-       n -= IDR_BITS;
+       n = p->layer * IDR_BITS;
        while ((n > 0) && p) {
                p = p->ary[(id >> n) & IDR_MASK];
                n -= IDR_BITS;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to