On 06/25/2014 03:35 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2014 07:01 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> ....
>> {
>> pgtable_t pte_pg;
>> + struct page *page;
>>
>> pte_pg = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT, __get_order_pte());
>> if (pte_pg) {
>> memzero((void *)pte_pg, PTRS_PER_PTE * 4);
>> - pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(pte_pg));
>> + page = virt_to_page(pte_pg);
>> + pgtable_page_ctor(page);
>> And now, it does not fix anything, so this does not fulfill the stable
>> rules. I cannot take it "as-is", sorry.
>
> What do u mean ? It changes pgtable_page_ctor() arg to be a lvalue since RT
> kernel
> has this. Current code fails to build, while fixed code builds//boots.
>
> +#define pgtable_page_ctor(page) \
> +do { \
> + page = __pgtable_page_ctor(page); \
> +} while (0)
But if this is an RT code, it is a bug and should be fixed, right? Or is
this an excerpt from the stable tree?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
