On 10 July 2014 16:45, Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me. But I think it would be better to move the invocation of > kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() itself, so that update_policy_cpu() > will do all the work involved in updating the policy->cpu, as its name > suggests.
Its called from remove path as well .. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
