On 17 July 2014 06:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote: > Quite frankly, to me this patch just does too much in one go without > describing about a half of things it is doing. > > I would just add the kobject_move() call to __cpufreq_add_dev() to > start with (because that's what you really want if I'm not mistaken) > and do the cleanups separately, later.
I understand that as I had similar feelings about it. See what I sent during V1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg54338.html Only when Srivatsa asked me to do the cleanups with it, I went for V2. And still wasn't really sure about getting that as a bug fix. And so had a chat with him again and asked you to push V1, and we will do cleanups later. So, I don't see V1 in patchworks anymore and I must resend? I will make out a series out of V2, first patch would be a fix for 3.16 & stable, and others would be for 3.17. Hope that works. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
