On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown > "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same > (battery defect?). > The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. > > Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery > [2] > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9
First off, stable kernel questions should go to [email protected], not just to me. Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are they not sufficient? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
