On 10/28/2014 06:56 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:18:56 -0600 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> diff -puN lib/scatterlist.c~lib-scatterlist-fix-memory-leak-with-scsi-mq 
>>> lib/scatterlist.c
>>> --- a/lib/scatterlist.c~lib-scatterlist-fix-memory-leak-with-scsi-mq
>>> +++ a/lib/scatterlist.c
>>> @@ -203,10 +203,10 @@ void __sg_free_table(struct sg_table *ta
>>>             }
>>>  
>>>             table->orig_nents -= sg_size;
>>> -           if (!skip_first_chunk) {
>>> -                   free_fn(sgl, alloc_size);
>>> +           if (skip_first_chunk)
>>>                     skip_first_chunk = false;
>>> -           }
>>> +           else
>>> +                   free_fn(sgl, alloc_size);
>>>             sgl = next;
>>>     }
>>>  
>>> _
>>
>> I already queued this one up in for-linus.
> 
> I'd have known that if for-linus was in -next...

Ah, but it _is_ in for-next, always is. But this particular patch was
queued up yesterday iirc, so the usual -next latency applies...

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to