Hello, Dan.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:21:08AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> index 5f4e0cca56ec..16f75854cd99 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ extern int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev,
> unsigned int sel);
> extern unsigned int ata_dev_set_feature(struct ata_device *dev,
> u8 enable, u8 feature);
> extern void ata_sg_clean(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> +extern struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_tag_order(struct ata_port *ap);
> +extern struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_fifo_order(struct ata_port *ap);
> extern void ata_qc_free(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> extern void ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> extern void __ata_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> index d81b20ddb527..59719ded8ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
>
> -#define DRV_NAME "sata_sil24"
> -#define DRV_VERSION "1.1"
> +#include "libata.h"
> +
> +#define SATA_SIL24_DRV_VERSION "1.1"
Why are we changing these in this patch?
> @@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ static struct ata_port_operations sil24_ops = {
> .qc_prep = sil24_qc_prep,
> .qc_issue = sil24_qc_issue,
> .qc_fill_rtf = sil24_qc_fill_rtf,
> + .qc_new = ata_qc_new_fifo_order,
Maybe it'd be easier to just make it a flag? Are we expecting other
varieties here?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
