2009/8/27 Kristján Valur Jónsson <krist...@ccpgames.com>: > Depends on what you mean by non-blocking. > We use the standard xml-rpc library with a "stackless blocking" socket module. > Look in the list archive, there was a discussion about various non-blocking > stackless sockets solutions a few weeks back.
Yeah, it is much better to replace standard sockets with stackless-compatible ones if you are going to use Stackless. Then you do not carry the burden of using a custom version of a library. The standard ones just work. Here's Andrew Dalke's canonical example of urllib being used this way: http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/2006-September/002796.html Stackless socket web page: http://code.google.com/p/stacklessexamples/wiki/StacklessNetworking Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
