Re: [Stackless] Fwd: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)

[Ronald Oussoren]

Richard,

On 6 Oct, 2009, at 5:27, Richard Tew wrote:

MacOS users.  What's up with the MacOS version on these installers?
Does it matter? Can I just provide one of them for all versions of
MacOS, are separate versions needed?  Can't you all just move to
Windows? (I kid on that last one)

need to have 3 versions of the DMG.


for macosx on the python.org website.


patch changes the default name of the framework install, but breaks
the build-installer.py script because that assumes that the default name
is Python.framework.

Ronald

I haven't build the DMG's below, but the intention of the build- installer.py script is that you end up with a binary that works on OSX 10.3.9 or later. There is no This works fine for plain python, I use the script to create the binary installers BTW. Could you (the stackless project) please consider to install stackless as "Stackless.framework" instead of "Python.framework". This would allow users to have both a regular python and stackless python installed. The attached

stackless-framework.patch
Description: Binary data

Cheers,
Richard.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Aleksandar Radulovic <a...@a13x.net>
Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Stackless Python 2.6.3 for OSX (dmg)
To: Richard Tew <richard.m....@gmail.com>


Hi Richard,

I build 2.6.3 for 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 - even with default settings
(10.3) it still adds the target
to the name, so it's just a matter of renaming the installer, I guess.


http://a13x.net/stackless/stackless-2.6.3-macosx10.3-2009-10-05.dmg
http://a13x.net/stackless/stackless-2.6.3-macosx10.4-2009-10-05.dmg
http://a13x.net/stackless/stackless-2.6.3-macosx10.5-2009-10-05.dmg

Would be best to check with others on the mailing list to see which
target is the
most used one..



Best regards,
alex.

I've put all three on the same location, they only differ in the target name: I'll build the 3.1.1 tomorrow, I had some problems with it earlier today.. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Aleksandar Radulovic <a...@a13x.net> wrote:

Hi Richard,


that's probably where the name comes from..


on majority of systems, should we support 10.4?


Will let you know..

-alex.

I've managed to compile and build the installer using 10.5 as deployment target, Question is, considering that Snow Leopard came out (10.6) and 10.5 seems to be Anyways, I can rebuild the DMG for 10.4, that shouldn't be a problem.. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Richard Tew <richard.m....@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Aleksandar Radulovic <a...@a13x.net> wrote:

Hi, Richard..


http://a13x.net/stackless/stackless-2.6.3-macosx10.5-2009-10-05.dmg

I'll let you knwo when I build the 3.1.1..

Regards,
alex.

I've finished with the build of Stackless for OS X, you can fetch it from here:

Hi Alex,


that important?  The others are versionless with regard to MacOS in

prefer to have the filenames consistent.

Cheers,
Richard.

Thanks for this. I see this is named with the MacOS version 10.5, is the file name, and if there is no difference with regard to this, I'd

--
a lex 13 x
http://www.a13x.info

--
a lex 13 x
http://www.a13x.info

_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless@stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless@stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless