On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Henning Diedrich <h...@authentic-internet.de> wrote: > > Richard Tew wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Dalke <da...@dalkescientific.com> > wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:35 PM, Richard Tew wrote: > > > They have an nice example where they chain 100000 microthreads each > wrapping the same function that increases the value of a passed > argument by one, with channels inbetween. Pumping a value through the > chain takes 1.5 seconds. I can't imagine that Stackless will be > anything close to that, given the difference between scripting and > compiled code. > > > Did I mess up in my benchmark? I got about 0.07 seconds to go through > 100,000 microthreads. > > > Interesting. I hadn't gone to the effort of writing it yet. I > expected the difference between a compiled language and a scripting > language to be more significant. > > > Well, it IS pretty impressing. Just the other way round. Was it really the > equivalent to the Go test?
It was slightly more complicated than the go test, which only sent one value through. The go test was in the tech talk presentation, I can't find a text version of it to link to unfortunately. Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
