On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Aleksandar Radulovic <[email protected]> wrote: > Kudos for the effort on the documentation! I skimmed through it and I > have so far only one comment - we should stick to the PEP-008 style > for Python code in the examples. Maybe it's just me (being so used to > reading and writting pep-8 code) but the example code in the chapter > about the scheduler was a bit "strange" to read..
Hi Alex, I consider PEP-008 irrelevant. It is one person's opinion on how code should look, made official enough to be waved around like a stick. The only time I hear about it is when people want me to rewrite code I have written to suit them. If this matters enough to anyone, I am sure I will receive a patch after the documentation files are checked in :-) Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
