I'm aware of what it was doing before, but this was just a minor annoyance.
# Steve On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:55 AM, OvermindDL1 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Steve Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Works for me. > > Yep, it does work now. The problem before is that the reply-to was > not being set by the list-serv, so in any properly conforming mail > client, when you reply then you were replying directly to the poster, > not to the list. LLVM's list is rather horrible broken in that way as > well, and I am not sure I *ever* responded to the list on my first try > here on the stackless list. There are of course some non-conforming > mail clients, but those are in the vast minority and are not correct > anyway, and even those obey the reply-to header, just that without the > reply-to header they still replied to the list even though they were > not supposed to according to the headers that were sent them. > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > -- Steve Rogers http://www.linkedin.com/in/shrogers “Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.” -- Theodore Roosevelt
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
