Hi,
Thanks, I am going to get to look at it.
Denis

> Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:25:21 -1000
> From: wer...@thieprojects.ch
> To: stackless@stackless.com
> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless on macos x
> 
> Hi Dennis
> 
> maybe this gives you another boost, posted a few weeks ago
> 
> """
> @Werner I created a Tap for stackless formula
> https://github.com/Alzakath/homebrew-stackless .
> 
> You just have to do `brew tap alzakath/stackless` then it should be
> possible to do `brew install stackless`.
> 
> Cheers
> Hervé
> """
> 
> Werner
> 
> 
> On 5/10/14 11:46 AM, Denis Fourt wrote:
> > Hi and thanks with the advice. I have actually installed readline with
> > HomeBrew. This was the easy part. I have made some search on the
> > internet and studied the HomeBrew formula for regular CPython 2.7,
> > trying to understand how to modify the setup.py file. So far I have
> > failed to correctly link stackless and readline (meaning a nice
> > segmentation fault likely from a mismatch between a *.h and and a library).
> >
> > I have considered using the dedicated readline python package, but have
> > postponed this option as one of the "easy" installer is required, which
> > I would like to avoid.
> >
> > As I have already managed to build stackless, I shall first explore the
> > stackless features through pypy (which is really easy to install with
> > HomeBrew), then shall switch to the real stackless when needed (that is
> > should I need something like numpy).
> >
> > Thanks to all for your help,
> >
> > Denis
> > Ps pypy has its own readline in python
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 21:50:11 +0200
> > From: tis...@stackless.com
> > To: stackless@stackless.com
> > Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless on macos x
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Out of the top of my head,
> > a simple work-around for the readline problem is
> > to install and setup homebrew, and then install
> > readline from homebrew.
> >
> > Works for CPython as well.
> >
> > I'm trying to use that for modules which I need but care
> > enough about to build and install them, myself.
> >
> > (but, not guaranteeing anything, just personal laziness)
> >
> > cheers - Chris
> >
> > On 07.05.14 07:34, Denis Fourt wrote:
> >
> >     Ok,
> >
> >     Why 2.7.5 instead of 2.7.6? Because I was advised to use the same
> >     revision as Python (which I understood as CPython)
> >
> >     Yes, it is a Python problem not a stackless one. But on macos x
> >     getting the readline seems not that easy because of the name
> >     conflict with the equivalent lib chosen by apple.
> >
> >     Thanks for all the help,
> >
> >     Denis
> >
> >      > Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:42:18 +1200
> >      > From: richard.m....@gmail.com <mailto:richard.m....@gmail.com>
> >      > To: stackless@stackless.com <mailto:stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless on macos x
> >      >
> >      > Get the corresponding source code for Python, compile it the same
> >     way.
> >      >
> >      > It should have all the same problems you mention. The Stackless
> >      > changes are completely unrelated to them.
> >      >
> >      > Not sure why you are using 2.7.5, there's a 2.7.6 tarball on the web
> >      > site download page. Or a 2.7.6 slp tag, you could use instead if you
> >      > really wanted to.
> >      >
> >      > Richard.
> >      >
> >      > On 5/7/14, Denis Fourt <denis.p...@hotmail.com>
> >     <mailto:denis.p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >      > > So I update to 2.7.5-slp. Here are my results (with clang):
> >      > > make complains about :
> >      > > Python build finished, but the necessary bits to build these
> >     modules were
> >      > > not found:_bsddb dl gdbm imageop
> >      > > linuxaudiodev ossaudiodev readline spwd
> >      > > sunaudiodev To find the necessary bits, look in setup.py in
> >      > > detect_modules() for the module's name.
> >      > > Some look unrelated to macos, but the readline would be nice to
> >     have. There
> >      > > was an option but the readme says it is deprecated. Any other
> >     important
> >      > > missed module here?
> >      > > Framework installation failed at the end (on a local directory,
> >     no sudo
> >      > > problem here) regular installation succeeded.
> >      > > Regards,
> >      > > Denis
> >      > > From: denis.p...@hotmail.com <mailto:denis.p...@hotmail.com>
> >      > > To: stackless@stackless.com <mailto:stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > > Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 10:58:49 -0400
> >      > > Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless on macos x
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > > Thanks for the information.
> >      > > Here is a short list of what I have found confusing :
> >      > > a) on http://www.stackless.com/wiki/Mercurial :It is not clear
> >     if the
> >      > > version numbers are not up to date or if it is the right
> >     revisions for that
> >      > > versions. In my opinion it should be clear how to choose the
> >     latest stable
> >      > > releases.
> >      > > b) choosing the right revision number seems impossible : so
> >     many available
> >      > > when browsing the sources (for example what means default?
> >     where is 2.7.6?)
> >      > > and then I tried to infer from the precompiled and in some
> >     cases I failed
> >      > > (2.7.6.r3, 3.1.3-slp, if I remember well).
> >      > > c) on http://www.stackless.com/wiki/Download the version
> >     numbers of the
> >      > > precompiled do not always match the already installed CPython
> >     2.7.6 for os
> >      > > 10.9 when it is actually 2.7.5.
> >      > > Hope this help,
> >      > > Denis
> >      > >> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 17:11:38 +1200
> >      > >> From: richard.m....@gmail.com <mailto:richard.m....@gmail.com>
> >      > >> To: stackless@stackless.com <mailto:stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > >> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless on macos x
> >      > >>
> >      > >> Denis,
> >      > >>
> >      > >> Despite what the website says, Stackless can be as simple as
> >     you want
> >      > >> to make it.
> >      > >>
> >      > >> Use the same compiler that is used by Python. Use the same
> >     revision
> >      > >> tags as Python but with the added 'slp'.
> >      > >>
> >      > >> If you find the website confusing please point out where it is
> >      > >> confusing and ideally the particular words you find confusing
> >     on it.
> >      > >>
> >      > >> Cheers,
> >      > >> Richard.
> >      > >>
> >      > >> On 5/6/14, Denis Fourt <denis.p...@hotmail.com>
> >     <mailto:denis.p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >      > >> > Hi,
> >      > >> > I would like to try stackless. I am using macos 10.9
> >     presently (in case
> >      > >> > of
> >      > >> > trouble I can still use 10.6). There is no ready to use
> >     installer that
> >      > >> > match
> >      > >> > the version of the already installed (by apple) python, so I
> >     do not
> >      > >> > think
> >      > >> > this is the best way (even if the versions had matched I
> >     would have
> >      > >> > avoided
> >      > >> > it, CPython does not replace the original, why Stackless
> >     should?)
> >      > >> > I can download the sources or clone the repository, but :I
> >     do not know
> >      > >> > which
> >      > >> > revision/branch/tag to use (the information on the web site
> >     looks a bit
> >      > >> > out
> >      > >> > dated)I do not know which compiler to use : clang or the old
> >     gcc4.2if
> >      > >> > the
> >      > >> > compiler choice has an impact later when installing packages.
> >      > >> > An alternative would be to use PyPy : for what reasons
> >     should I prefer
> >      > >> > Stackless (not taking into account the fact that some Python
> >     packages
> >      > >> > like
> >      > >> > numpy do not work with PyPy)?
> >      > >> > Thanks for the help,
> >      > >> > Denis
> >      > >>
> >      > >> _______________________________________________
> >      > >> Stackless mailing list
> >      > >> Stackless@stackless.com <mailto:Stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > > _______________________________________________
> >      > > Stackless mailing list
> >      > > Stackless@stackless.com <mailto:Stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >      >
> >      > _______________________________________________
> >      > Stackless mailing list
> >      > Stackless@stackless.com <mailto:Stackless@stackless.com>
> >      > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Stackless mailing list
> >     Stackless@stackless.com  <mailto:Stackless@stackless.com>
> >     http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christian Tismer             :^)tis...@stackless.com  
> > <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
> > Software Consulting          :http://www.stackless.com/
> > Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :http://www.pydica.net/
> > 14482 Potsdam                :     GPG key -> 0xFB7BEE0E
> > phone +49 173 24 18 776  fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list
> > Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stackless mailing list
> > Stackless@stackless.com
> > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> Stackless@stackless.com
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
                                          
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless@stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

Reply via email to