yea that was one possibility i had considered (and may do it yet). If I am the only one oh well. If I come up with a good solution, I push the changes (or maybe make them part of stacklesslib) push a change at you guys.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Richard Tew <richard.m....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Robert Babiak <rbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > End point, is that I think when you run stackless, something like trying > to > > build your own 'python.exe' should be doable and play nice with stackless > > scheduling. I did a lot of googling to try and solve this, and there > was no > > ready made solutions that are cross platform. > > You're the only person to ask for this Robert. I looked at getting it > working back in 2005, and decided it wasn't worth it. For most > people, it will be enough to just run the interpreter and use it as > is. For anyone else who needs a Stackless-compatible Python prompt, > they can do what CCP did way back in 2001. Open a socket and give a > telnet-based prompt - socket read/write operations are > Stackless-compatible and can easily be done with stacklesssocket.py > module, or with stacklesslib, which incorporates the latest version of > stacklesssocket. > > Cheers, > Richard. > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > Stackless@stackless.com > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > -- Life: Bah, I will worry about it when it is over.
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
