I have also observed the same behavior. Please suggest. G
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph, Saneesh Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [staf-users] Performance issue with STAF?? I observed that STAF takes much more time - about 2.5 times - as compared to the manual execution. I am running a batch file ( around 500 test cases ) using staf on a remote machine that takes more than an hour, and 17-20 mins otherwise. Is that because of a lower memory utilization by STAF? Is there any option to increase the memory allocated to STAF so that I can bring down the execution time? Many thanks, Saneesh Joseph ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ staf-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users DISCLAIMER ========== This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ staf-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
