---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <dudeja.ra...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [staf-users] Unable to use Static Handle with the consecutive
commands in a STAX job file
To: Sharon Lucas <luc...@us.ibm.com>, David Bender <bda...@us.ibm.com>
Thanks Guys,
I changed the above code to queue messages using <script> instead of
<stafcmd> and now the REQUESTs (queue messages) are sent with the desired
STATIC handle and I can even GET / PEEK them.
Thanks for your valuable suggestions guys !!
Thanks,
Rajat
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Sharon Lucas <luc...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> As David said a <stafcmd> and a <process> element can only be submitted via
> the STAX job's handle. You cannot create a handle and use it to submit a
> STAF service request via a <stafcmd> or <process> element.
>
> If you really need to receive messages on a handle's queue within a STAX
> job, then see section "Sample STAX Job 3 - Creating a STAF Handle and Using
> it's Queue" in the STAX User's Guide at
> http://staf.sourceforge.net/current/STAX/staxug.html#Header_SampleJob3.
> It shows a STAX job that demonstrates how to create your own STAF handle
> within a STAX job and use it's queue to get messages (e.g. that are being
> sent via your Python program).
>
> Note that you should not use the STAX job handle's queue as that will
> interfere with the use of the qaueue by the STAX service as described in the
> "Concepts" section, sub-section "Queues".
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon Lucas
> IBM Austin, luc...@us.ibm.com
> (512) 286-7313 or Tieline 363-7313
>
>
>
> *dudeja.ra...@gmail.com*
>
> 01/30/2009 11:49 AM
> To
> David Bender/Austin/i...@ibmus
> cc
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject
> Re: [staf-users] Unable to use Static Handle with the consecutive
> commands in a STAX job file
>
>
>
>
> >Correct, you cannot use a static handle for <stafcmd> elements in a STAX
> job. If you want to queue messages to a process, then the >recommended
> method is to use the <process-action> element .
>
> But, what if I want to create only one process and queue it the multiple
> messages one by one, as REQUEST which this process executes and sends back
> the RESPONSE. Based on this response I get back in XML job, I decide to send
> another REQUEST. In this scenario the <process-action> does not fit
> appropriately as it cannot be called independently and can only be called
> with <process> element. Or, I decide to send all REQUESTS in one chunk using
> <process-action> but this is certainly I'm not trying to achieve.
>
> As you can see in my previous mail, I'm intending to run only a single
> instance of Python (via STDIN python program). And, in future I also wish to
> achieve the same functionality on remote test machine.
>
> My Python program just works fine. It can register itself with the static
> handle, send and receive messages on queue using the same static handle. Its
> just the XML that's causing these problems.
>
> Has there been any implementation lately using this scenario.?
>
> Thanks.
> Rajat
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_______________________________________________
> staf-users mailing list
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
>
>
--
Regrads,
Rajat
--
Regrads,
Rajat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
staf-users mailing list
staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
