[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057883#comment-13057883
 ] 

Rupert Westenthaler commented on STANBOL-241:
---------------------------------------------

regarding the definition of "stable":
For me "stable" is also a question of how stable the features provided by this 
set of components are.

about Components:

LangId is for me no candidate for the stable launcher, because it has a LGPL 
dependency that is very unlikely to be resolved. Therefore it will most likely 
be not in a stanbol release. We should not include functionality in the stable 
launcher that is than missing in a release.

Metaxa is quite useful and it would be a good to have it in the stable 
launcher. However in the long term it would need to be refactored from an 
Engine to the a Content Adapter. I think that even for a release it would be ok 
to keep Metaxa as an Engine, therefore this should be no argument for excluding 
it from the stable launcher.

Regarding OpenCalais, Zamanta and Geonames: This engines all need an API key 
*). We need simple to decide if we want to include those engines in the stable 
launcher or not. As long as they are "unsatisfied" without the required API key 
they do not really hurt and if users do have the required key it would be much 
easier for them to start using them.

In any case we need to validate that the Enhancements created by such engines 
are in conformance with the Enhancement Structure because we can not aspect 
from users to adapt there clients only because the are activating a different 
set of Engines.
E.g. I know that the Zemanta Engine can not provide entity-types values for 
EntityAnnotations something that may be a real issue for users. Geonames should 
be ok in that respect. I have not had a detailed look at the OpenCalais Engine.

best
Rupert

*) This is also true for geonames, because there is the possibility to create a 
free account and than use the api.geonames.org server that is much more stable 
than the one that allows anonymous connections.

> Create a "stable" launcher for Apache Stanbol
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STANBOL-241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-241
>             Project: Stanbol
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Rupert Westenthaler
>            Assignee: Fabian Christ
>
> The Idea is to discontinue the "stateless" launcher and convert it to a 
> launcher that only include features that are stable.
> This should also help to identify components to be included in a first 
> Stanbol release
> Use this issue to discuss what components to be included

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to