[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13142127#comment-13142127
]
Fabian Christ commented on STANBOL-370:
---------------------------------------
+1 for not using camel case.
About the naming we should think about what distinguishes the different job
manager implementations. I'm -1 for "default" because the default might change
in the future. "simple" is not good either because there may be a simpler one
;) What about "static" because it does not allow dynamic reordering?
And perhaps the old eu.iksproject.fise packages could be renamed.
> Change StanbolJobManager Structure
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-370
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-370
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Florent ANDRE
>
> The idea is to get a folder structure like Engines stuff for hold Jobmanager
> implementations
> This actually mean :
> * move the Jobmanager folder from enhancer/generic/jobmanager to
> enhancer/jobmanager
> * create inside the jobmanager a pom and folders to hold differents
> implementations.
> * Create an inMemory folder for this implementation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
