Hi Fabian, all,

a quick summary on behalf of STLab people
for clarifying with regard to the Stanbol software that is developed here.

The current OWL API release used in Stanbol is Release 3.2.3 and it's 
dual-licensed.
Hence, there is no problem in including the OWL API. I had a further 
confirmation from OWL API developers who told me that if any of the test files 
do not include an explicit mention this is just a typo. We have full support 
from them.

For what concerns Hermit, it cannot be released with dual license because it 
has other dependences on LGPL-licensed components, hence we gave up! 
We have planned to re-implement the Stanbol/reasoners component basing it on 
Jena, 
but this won't be ready by the first official release of Stanbol. 
The only components relying on Hermit is Stanbol/rules, and AFAIK 
ontologymanager/store.
Stanbol/reasoners will be included in a next release. 

OWLlink will be released with dual license, but yet this didn't happen. 
I'll solicit them but I wouldn't expect to have such release before August 
20th. 

Currently we are working on fixing a bug in the integration test, and refining 
documentation of rules.
We also have a demo for rules to be included in the release.

Val



On Jul 18, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:

> 2011/7/18 Olivier Grisel <[email protected]>:
>> 2011/7/18 valentina presutti <[email protected]>:
>>> Enrico sent the email below some months ago.
>>> Let me know if we need additional info, in case I'll email the OWL API 
>>> developers.
>> 
>> AFAIK, the issue is no longer with OWLAPI (as soon as they release a
>> new version) but with the reasoner itself Hermitt (for which Enrico
>> told it was too complicated to ask for a license changed because of
>> dependencies).
> 
> Okay - but NOW we don't have an official version with that license.
> 
> IMO we don't want to wait for them to make a release. So I would
> prefer to exclude OWLAPI from the first release.
> 
> -- 
> Fabian

Reply via email to