While we sort this out I intend to replace local ontologies with
in-house ones and put Apache blurbs in owl:versionInfo annotations AND
xml comment headers. Then we can see about the most appropriate way.
Are we allowed to use namespaces like
http://stanbol.apache.org/ontologies/ to avoid any sort of attribution
conflicts, or should we wait for graduation first? Consider that actual
dereferencing is not required right now (tests have to work offline so
we can assume no dereferencing).
Alessandro
On 7/19/11 2:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Alessandro Adamou<[email protected]> wrote:
...as per STANBOL-277 we have an issue about licensing ontologies in local
resources.
Who can confirm whether Creative Commons is Apache-compliant?...
Depends on the exact flavor, see
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html - if the licenses of your
stuff fit into what's mentioned there we'll be fine. Might need an
addition to our NOTICES files if attribution is required.
-Bertrand
--
M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Department of Computer Science
Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, Bologna - Italy
Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
National Research Council (CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
"As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am beyond their timid, lying
morality, and so I am beyond caring."
(Col. Walter E. Kurtz)
