Hi Alex,
I have made some improvements regarding the war launcher. First, when
the war file is deployed on Tomcat, it starts automatically. Also,
static resources e.g css, images are displayed correctly. As far as I
tried, HTTP service for SOLR cores is also working. For example, I
executed a query like {stanbolhost}/solr/default/dbpedia/select?q=Paris
and was able to obtain results.
BTW, I used Tomcat 7.0.23 to test the changes.
Best,
Suat
On 11/25/2011 05:43 PM, Alex Lopez wrote:
> Thanks Suat for clarifications, :) no problem I'll go on with the jar
> launcher and switch to war into my Tomcat later.
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> First of all, I am still working on this launcher and it's not fully
>> tested yet. I just gave a break as I had to focus on other issues.
>> Please see my other comments inline.
>>
>> On 11/25/2011 05:00 PM, Alex Lopez wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to run Stanbol using the full-war launcher (into a
>>> Tomcat 7.0.21, using the /stanbol context).
>>>
>>> The app deployed fine, but after it showed several problems:
>>>
>>> - The first visit to host/stanbol to check if everything was OK
>>> yielded an error (404 if I remember right). Then tomcat log start to
>>> show some "initiating Jersey app" messages, then after some seconds a
>>> subsequent visit to host/stanbol works. So it behaves like it needed a
>>> first request to wake up.
>>
>> Yes, this case was same for me.
>>
>>> - No CSS or images displayed (no /stanbol context added to path of
>>> static resources).
>>
>> This is related about deployment location of static resources. I was
>> working on this but I didn't complete yet. I will inform you when I
>> commit the change that fixes this issue.
>>
>>> - SOLR search not working at host/stanbol/solr anymore (I've had
>>> problems before with SOLR + Tomcat7, could it be this?)
>>>
>>
>> I didn't check the new updates on SOLR yet, so I don't have a clear idea
>> on this. As I said, I didn't finish the work on full-war launcher yet
>> and will inform through the list when finished. Sorry for the
>> inconvenience.
>>
>> Best,
>> Suat
>>
>>> Are these expected or I am doing something wrong? (I'm running Stanbol
>>> svn revision 1202633)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>