Hi all

As some might know there was an IKS Hackathon about CreateJS 
(http://createjs.org/) last week in Zürich 
(http://lanyrd.com/2012/createjs-hackathon/).

While Stanbol played only a side role in this meet up David, Reto and me still 
used this come together to discuss about the currently ongoing extensions to 
the Stanbol Enhancer 

especially 

* STANBOL-414, STANBOL-431: Multipart ContentItems, Enhancement Chains, 
Enhancement Engines REST API
* STANBOL-46: Asynchronous Enhancements

I have documented - my interpretation - of the results such discussion within 

    
http://stanbol.staging.apache.org/stanbol/docs/trunk/enhancer/STANBOL-414-specification.html

with the request for feedback and further discussion

best
Rupert



On 06.01.2012, at 16:48, David Riccitelli wrote:

> I forgot to send the reference links:
> 
>   1. Asynchronous enhancements:
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-46
>   2. Long term operations:
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-343
>   3. Stanbol jobs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-383
> 
> D.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 4:47 PM, David Riccitelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello guys,
>> 
>> At the Zurich CreateJS Hackathon we started working on the asynchronous
>> jobs for Stanbol. More specifically we need a REST API that allows us to:
>> 1. start an enhancement job (passing its configuration data),
>> 2. check its status and progress,
>> 3. retrieve the results once the process is complete [1],
>> 4. cancel an ongoing job.
>> 
>> We saw recently the release of the long-term jobs for the Reasoning
>> Services by Enrico Daga [2,3], and found that it can mostly satisfy the
>> above mentioned requirements with the exception of monitoring the actual
>> job progress.
>> 
>> I talked with Rupert about it, and he's looking forward to the
>> asynchronous operations OSGI postEvent/sendEvent methods, which would allow
>> us to reshape the way the tasks are instantiated, their progress monitored
>> and managed.
>> 
>> I would like to define with you the requirements for the asynchronous jobs
>> and a path in order to reach this goal, if you agree.
>> 
>> In the meanwhile I've been implementing a raw
>> EnhancerJob/EnhancerJobResult implementation in order to enable the *
>> commons.jobs* APIs to be used with the *enhancer*, and I can share this
>> work if you'd like.
>> 
>> BR,
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> --
>> David Riccitelli
>> 
>> 
>> ********************************************************************************
>> InsideOut10 s.r.l.
>> P.IVA: IT-11381771002
>> Fax: +39 0110708239
>> ---
>> LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/in/riccitelli
>> Twitter: ziodave
>> ---
>> Layar Partner 
>> Network<http://www.layar.com/publishing/developers/list/?page=1&country=&city=&keyword=insideout10&lpn=1>
>> 
>> ********************************************************************************
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Riccitelli
> 
> ********************************************************************************
> InsideOut10 s.r.l.
> P.IVA: IT-11381771002
> Fax: +39 0110708239
> ---
> LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/in/riccitelli
> Twitter: ziodave
> ---
> Layar Partner 
> Network<http://www.layar.com/publishing/developers/list/?page=1&country=&city=&keyword=insideout10&lpn=1>
> ********************************************************************************

Reply via email to