Am 14. Februar 2012 13:41 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>:
>>> If you use that plugin, it would be better IMO to define the
>>> exclusions in a separate file outside of the pom, to make it clearer
>>> when those exclusions change.
>>
>> Good idea. But how do you define the configuration for a plugin (the
>> RAT exclusions in this case) outside of the POM? Is there something
>> like an include?...
>
> There's no general mechanism, the plugin would have to support that,
> but unfortunately looking at
> http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/check-mojo.html IIUC
> it doesn't, so exclusions have to be in the pom for now.

Currently, we add the exclusion in the POM and point to a separate
README that lists the files and their licenses, like in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/enhancer/benchmark/pom.xml

For files that are not AL20 we add a note in NOTICE and add the
license in LICENSE.

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

Reply via email to