On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Olivier Grisel <[email protected]>wrote:
> Le 2 avril 2012 11:28, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Reto pointed me to this document > > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#criteriaandcategories > > > > and since OWL-API is AL20 licensed it is a category A dependency which > > may be included "in both source and binary form". > > Yes but we should not include binaries in a *source* release. It would > be fine in a binary distribution of Stanbol. > Where does his should-level requirement comes from? For category B license it is actually recommended to include them only in binary form and the primary apache releases are always source releases. Cheers, Reto
