Hi, On 04/10/2012 05:27 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Le 10 avril 2012 13:59, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> a écrit : >> Dear Stanbolers, >> >> I woud like to remind you that we have an open vote for the RC6 here. >> Please, review the release so that we can proceed and get a release >> ready to be voted for on the incubator mailing list. >> >> I still do not know if it will be problem that we have included the >> OWL-API JAR in the source release. If this is a blocker, we have to >> provide a -deps package along with the source release that contains >> the OWL-API JAR. IMO we should not wait for the OWL-API people to >> publish their work on central as this would cost additional time. > I am ok to include the owl-api jar in the source release (while > waiting for upstream to push it on maven central) as other apache > projects seem to do so too. > > However there is also this jar: > > ./contenthub/search/related/src/main/resources/local-maven-repository/edu/smu/tspell/jaws/1.2/jaws-1.2.jar > > which AFAIK does not have any licensing info: > > http://lyle.smu.edu/~tspell/jaws/index.html > > By doing a quick grep on the edu.smu.tspell.jaws package in the > contenthub/related subproject, it does not seem to be used anywhere. > Shall we get rid of this dependency? > > Suat can you explain what this is needed for? >
It is used to obtain related keywords from Wordnet for the original query term in featured search of Contenthub. But, its license issue has been solved in STANBOL-445 and in STANBOL-550 Bertrand commented that it was an Apache like one. Best, Suat
