Hi Bertrand, 2012/6/18 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Fabian Christ > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ...please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC2).... > > Sorry but I have to vote -1 on this, the -source-release.zip archives > in the staged release do not contain the DISCLAIMER file that's > required for incubator releases. Considering how the build is nicely > automated, I hope it's just a matter of tweaking a few settings.
Okay. Thanks. Did not think about the DISCLAIMER. It's easy to add. >> ...- source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating >> tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating... > > Note that we cannot vote on svn tags - from the comments in your vote > I understand that's clear for you, but people might be tempted to do > that ;-) > > I have just committed two helper scripts at the top of the Stanbol > trunk, lifted from Sling, here's how people can use them for your > "197" staged release: > > ./check_staged_release.sh 197 > downloads the staged repository so that you can look at it, and checks > digests and signatures (if you have imported > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/KEYS) > > ./check_release_matches_tag.sh 197 /tmp/stanbol-staging > checks that the downloaded source-release archives match the > corresponding svn tags. This is not required for Apache releases but I > usually do that as a sanity check. > > We can then vote on the contents of those source-release archives - > people should download them with the above script, check them, and I > usually include their md5 digests in my vote to have a precise > reference. Nice and thanks. I have seen those scripts and thought about adapting them for Stanbol. Cool we have them now. With this -1, the vote is canceled. I will prepare another RC hopefully tomorrow that will fix the mentioned points. Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
