Hi Rupert and all,

yes, right now it seems I have full CRUD access for the entityhub (on DFKI server) from my localhost 'across origins'.

I just checked the RESTful services I tried during the last weeks:
(I can report that on STANBOL-105 later on, if you want)

<uri> <Access-Control-Request-Method> <Access-Control-Allow-Methods>

presently working:
--------------------------
./entityhub/entity POST {GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS} ./entityhub/entity?update=true POST {GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS} ./entityhub/entity?id=<id>&create=false PUT {GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS} ./entityhub/entity?id=<id> DELETE {GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS}
./contenthub/ldpath/program                POST    (ok)
./contenthub/<index>/store/<id>            POST    (ok)
./ontonet/ontology/pizzaScope            POST     (303 see other)

(entity/mapping ist trivial, weil nur GET)

presently NOT-working:
--------------------------------
./ontonet/ontology/pizzaScope PUT {GET, POST, OPTIONS} ./ontonet/ontology/pizzaScope DELETE {GET, POST, OPTIONS}
./contenthub/ldpath/program/<indexID>            DELETE
./contenthub/contenthub/store/raw/<id> GET (this is really strange, since the GET on ./contenthub/contenthub/store/metadata/<id> works and a few weeks ago, both requests worked perfectly. So this might be a version issue with my code)






Am 27.06.2012 19:39, schrieb Rupert Westenthaler:
Hi Melanie

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Melanie Reiplinger
<[email protected]>  wrote:
Hi Rupert.

The Access-Control-Allow-Methods is now sent in the response. And again, I
get
Method PUT is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Methods.
Headers of preflight request are attached below. Looks to me like here, the
PUT and DELETE are really simply not allowed on serverside (only GET; POST;
OPTIONS). For the entityhub enpoint, my PUT and DELETE requests both work on
the updated version :-)
Does PUT now work or not? Do you indicate that PUT and DELETE now work
on the Entityhub, but you do have still problems on other RESTful
endpoints?
If so, than we are at least one step further - as we have now
conformation that CORES works.

Implementors of RESTful services need to parse the HTTP methods they
want to provide. So if you get "not allowed" errors it is a bug in the
implementation.

I think the best would be to just report in the form

{uri} {method}

e.g.

     http://lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9001/ontonet/ontology/pizzaScope PUT

this should it make easy to fix those on the server side.

I think it is best to use STANBOL-105 for reporting

best
Rupert

1.
   Request URL:
   http://lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9001/ontonet/ontology/pizzaScope

2.
   Request Method:
   OPTIONS
3.
   Status Code:
   200 OK
4. Request Headersview source
    1.
       Accept:
       */*
    2.
       Accept-Charset:
       ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
    3.
       Accept-Encoding:
       gzip,deflate,sdch
    4.
       Accept-Language:
       de-DE,de;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4
    5.
       Access-Control-Request-Headers:
       origin, accept
    6.
       Access-Control-Request-Method:
       PUT
    7.
       Cache-Control:
       max-age=0
    8.
       Connection:
       keep-alive
    9.
       Host:
       lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9001
   10.
       Origin:
       http://localhost
   11.
       Referer:
       http://localhost/VIE_testing/ontonet.html
   12.

       User-Agent:
       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML,
       like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.56 Safari/536.5
5. Response Headersview source
    1.
       Access-Control-Allow-Headers:
       origin, accept
    2.
       Access-Control-Allow-Methods:
       GET, POST, OPTIONS
    3.
       Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
       *
    4.
       Access-Control-Expose-Headers:
       Location
    5.
       Content-Length:
       0
    6.
       Server:
       Jetty(6.1.x)




Am 25.06.2012 23:02, schrieb Rupert Westenthaler:

On 25.06.2012, at 21:21, Melanie Reiplinger wrote:

Hi Rupert,

I tried with the your suggestion, but sending the "X-Requested-With"
header is echoed in the "Access-Control-Allow-Headers", but does not help in
the PUT / DELETE problem. For some reason, the preflight request fails.
Also, there is no "Access-Control-Allow-Methods" send back in reply,
instead the "Access-Control-Request-Method.

What Stanbol version do you test against. In the trunk there is now a unit
test that validates that the "Access-Control-Allow-Methods" is correctly
added to CORS preflight responses [1]. So if you still get the
  "Access-Control-Request-Method" it would explain why you do not get the
expected results.

Please make sure that you use "org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base"
version "0.10.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT". You can check that in the bundles tab
of the Apache Felix Webconsole

best
Rupert


[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/commons/web/base/src/test/java/org/apache/stanbol/commons/web/base/CorsAccessControlAllowMethodTest.java


1.
   Request URL:

http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub/entity?id=http://developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html
2.
   Request Method:
   OPTIONS
3.
   Status Code:
   200 OK
4. Request Headersview source
    1.
       Accept:
       */*
    2.
       Accept-Charset:
       ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
    3.
       Accept-Encoding:
       gzip,deflate,sdch
    4.
       Accept-Language:
       de-DE,de;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4
    5.
       Access-Control-Request-Headers:
       origin, x-requested-with, accept
    6.
       Access-Control-Request-Method:
       DELETE
    7.
       Connection:
       keep-alive
    8.
       Host:
       dev.iks-project.eu:8081
    9.
       Origin:
       http://localhost
   10.
       Referer:
       http://localhost/VIE_testing/UD.html
   11.
       User-Agent:
       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML,
       like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.56 Safari/536.5
5. Query String Parametersview URL encoded
    1.
       id:
       http://developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html
6. Response Headersview source
    1.
       Access-Control-Allow-Headers:
       origin, x-requested-with, accept
    2.
       Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
       *
    3.
       Access-Control-Request-Method:
       GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS
    4.
       Content-Length:
       0
    5.
       Server:
       Jetty(6.1.x)



Am 30.05.2012 15:14, schrieb Rupert Westenthaler:
Hi Melanie,

in your original mail you listed the Request and Response header. For
me it seamed that those headers where from the OPTIONS request and not
from the actual DELETE. This was the reason why I ask if you are sure
that the Browser actually sends the DELETE request.

I am assuming the the DELETE is not sent because some kind of problem.
Its just a guess, but maybe because jQuery wants to use the
"X-Requested-With" header and it is not included in the
"Access-Control-Allow-Headers". As the Stanbol CORS implementation
currently only echoes the parsed "Access-Control-Request-Headers"
values you could try to add additional headers to that list.

I am not an expert in Javascript development and Web-Browser
debugging, but I will try to get some help from szaby. Maybe he can
help me in reproducing this.

best
Rupert

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Melanie Reiplinger
<[email protected]>     wrote:
Hi Rupert,

Since I can inspect the complete request and response headers in the
Developer Tools Window of the Browser, I supposed that the PUT or
DELETE
requests are actually sent (since if a request fails in sending, I can
only
see fragments of the headers).

The returned "Access-Control-Allow-Headers" holds origin, content-type,
accept
The requested looks just the same:
Access-Control-Request-Headers:
origin, content-type, accept



Am 25.05.2012 12:52, schrieb Rupert Westenthaler:

Hi Melanie,

does the Server actually send the PUT, DELETE request, or does it
already fail after receiving the OPTIONS request?

What would be the HTTP headers for the PUT, DELETE request. Maybe they
do not match with the returned "Access-Control-Allow-Headers" (origin,
content-type, accept).

best
Rupert

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Melanie Reiplinger
<[email protected]>       wrote:
Hi all.

Has someone successfully done PUT or DELETE requests on e.g. the
entityhub
via XMLHttpRequest?
I'm at revision 1341602 and from looking at the CorsHelper code I
figured
that the Access-Control-Allow-Methods should now be set in the
response
header, but I'm still getting

XMLHttpRequest cannot load<url>


<http://lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9000/entityhub/entity?id=http%3A//developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html>.
Method DELETE is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Methods.

Do I have to send something special in my Request header to make it
work?:

1.
   Request URL:



http://lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9000/entityhub/entity?id=http%3A//developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html
2.
   Request Method:
   OPTIONS
3.
   Status Code: 200 OK

Request Header:

    1.
       Accept:
       */*
    2.
       Accept-Charset:
       ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
    3.
       Accept-Encoding:
       gzip,deflate,sdch
    4.
       Accept-Language:
       de-DE,de;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6,en;q=0.4
    5.
       Access-Control-Request-Headers:
       origin, content-type, accept
    6.
       Access-Control-Request-Method:
       DELETE
    7.
       Connection:
       keep-alive
    8.
       Host:
       lnv-89012.dfki.uni-sb.de:9000
    9.
       Origin:
       http://localhost
   10.
       Referer:



http://localhost/VIE/test/?filter=vie.js%20-%20Apache%20Stanbol%20Service%3A%20VIE.js%20StanbolService%20-%20CRUD%20on%20local%20entities
   11.
       User-Agent:
       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML,
       like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5
1. Query String Parametersview URL encoded
    1.
       id:
       http://developer.yahoo.com/javascript/howto-proxy.html


Response Header:

1.
   Access-Control-Allow-Headers:
   origin, content-type, accept
2.
   Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
   *
3.
   Access-Control-Request-Method:
   GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS
4.
   Content-Length:
   0
5.
   Server:
   Jetty(6.1.x)





Reply via email to