Hi Fabian, all Yes this is still developed within an own branch that we started during the Hackathon in Saarbrücken. But you are completely right this development was - until now - not visible enough to the community. Especially because this design of splitting up
1st level storage that keeps the data and a 2nd level storage that allows to build special indexes of the data is something that is not only interesting for the Contenthub, but might be also adapted by the Entityhub. Especially when we want to have the functionality of the Entityhub indexing tool available within the Stanbol Environment. This would require to have a storage for the Entity data (could be even a remote Service) and a 2nd storage that holds the indexed data. Such a design could us even give more flexibility to build special indexes - e.g. adding surface forms as alternate labels, collection mentions for MLT queries, following related, broader or other relations to build semantic contexts ... capabilities like that would be key for adding things like Entity-Disambiguation to Apache Stanbol. Especially if you want to use it with user managed vocabularies - without re-indexing the whole vocabulary after changes. best Rupert On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/7/20 Suat Gonul <[email protected]>: >> Again let me remind you that, this work is carried on under the >> "contenthub-two-layered-structure" branch. Sorry for the bulk update, > > I am sorry Suat! - I did not recognize that you are still working in > your own branch. I was thinking that there was a big change to the > trunk without any notification before that. In this case - everything > is fine ;) > > Best, > - Fabian > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
