On 11/08/12 15:07, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
A discussion is taking place on the Apache Incubator mailing list about
the future of Clerezza.
There are suggestions that Stanbol might want to adopt Clerezza.
General question - just not specific to the "Clerezza/TLP or not" thread:
I see various "rdf.jena...." in the Stanbol parent.
Is there anything that useful that Jena can do to help here? Supply
OSGi-packages? To Clerezza? Directly? Maybe some small changes would
make things easier upstream from Jena.
As Reto has pointed out, Clerezza has quite wide coverage but if there
is anything that would help, please do tell us/Jena.
Andy
Cheers,
Andreas
-------- Original Message --------
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:33:56 +0200
Subject: Re: Clerezza status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of
"August2012" by BertrandDelacretaz)
From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/08/12 23:16, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If the efforts to grow or reactivate the community fail, would it be a
good idea to seek to join forces with some related projects like
Stanbol, Any23 or UIMA? Or do you feel that there are still enough
active people to allow the project to function as a standalone TLP
(able to reach 3 PMC votes for releases, etc.)?
Or Jena.
I think from the scope of the application (platform for semantic web
applications) clerezza is the closest to jena. However from the software
architecture clerezza is signifantly closer to Stanbol. Main elements of
clerezza are a very spec close layered RDF API and a platform based on
OSGi, not sure how much the Jena community is interested in these.
Reto
