Andreas Monitzer wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 18:23, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:I've implemented it. It works pretty well, and I haven't had any issues, except that specifying the width and height isn't that easy for a client (I actually had write a parser for png headers for this). Maybe these two could be made optional?How about recommended (SHOULD include)? :)That's fine for me :)
Done in version 0.10 :) http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0084.html I'll probably request a Last Call on XEP-0084 at the next Council meeting.
Usually, clients don't need instant notification for changes to the profile, that's why it's not really absolutely necessary to use PEP there. Of course, it'd simplify server implementations, so it's definitely something to look into.Yes, there is that issue, too -- do people need notifications about profiles or is that data more static? If static, why use PEP?Well, you wouldn't need any special cases for vCards on the server any more. Just implement PEP, and you're done for 90% of the non-messaging stuff used for IM. If the client doesn't announce that it'd like to get notified of changes to that PEP node, it wouldn't receive unnecessary data, but could still request the info explicitly, which is right how vCards work right now.
Right, that's the appeal. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre XMPP Standards Foundation http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
