I think I must have misunderstood this when it came by the last
time. I assumed that you were talking about a brand-new protocol
without backward-compatibility. Great idea!
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:33:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
That is not true. Years ago I have proposed other solution:
Ah, I don't remember that. Do you have a pointer to the mailing list
archive?
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2003-September/004142.html
Greets,
Jacek
