Chris Mullins wrote: > That verbage makes the answer clear. Thanks! > > I'm not in the habit yet of checking the bis revisions of the specs. > I'll have to change that, and make it my starting point.
Good idea. In general, the bis specs incorporate errata, corrections, clarifications, and a lot more examples than the original RFCs (we put the example in example.com!). /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
