Ralph Meijer wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:37 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Andreas Monitzer wrote: >>> [..] >>> Most of the inactive ones are PEP-based, which itself takes a lot of >>> time to be implemented, and so it doesn't make any sense to work on >>> those any further until this is resolved. >> Well, true -- all those "User *ing" specs. Last year sometime Jean-Louis >> Seguineau suggested that we might want to work with people outside the >> Jabber realm on Atom extensions for those (rather than making our own >> little formats for everything). I'm open to that but haven't yet figured >> out who to engage in that kind of conversation. > > I don't see anything particularly wrong with defining our own little > formats for these pieces of information.
I don't either. They can always be translated to some nice Atom extension formats if someone ever defines those. Plus it seems that Jean-Louis isn't here anymore to complain if we move forward with non-Atom formats. ;-) > While I absolutely love the > Atom format, I don't know what we would gain from defining the > additional elements on top of Atom instead of directly on PEP. If there > are other formats in the same realm, we should probably provide sensible > mappings, though. Remember why we chose our own location spec over the > RFC... /me nods > That said, we /should/ finalize our efforts in the Atom over pubsub for > various other uses. Such as blog items and other typically feed like > transport (flickr, delicious, etc). Agreed. Once we have the next round of updates to XEP-0060 finished, I will move forward on draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05 at the IETF. /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
