Robin Redeker wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 09:20:27AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: >>> I think the whole XEP should be renamed to something like: >>> >>> XEP-0106 - JID Mapping for Gateways >> This would be better. But it breaks the generic usage of JIDs for both users >> and gateways. It will create a lot of trouble. >> > > The XEP seems to already create a lot of trouble. Just remind me to > register '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' when every client unescapes JIDs ;-)
No problem. The spec says: "The character sequence \20 MUST NOT be the first or last character of an escaped node identifier." But of course you can violate the spec if desired. ;-) /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
