Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: > Hello > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:40:25AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Clearly we can't allow @ because we use that character >> as a separator between the node identifier and the domain identifier. > > Email address can contain @ in the username part - the identifier is the > last @ in the address.
Really? I don't see that in RFC 2822, but I'm not fluent in ABNF. :) > But Emails don't have resources. We would have to > decide which is more valuable to have in the node part allowed - one of > them can not be allowed. I'd vote against "@" and say that a node could include "/". /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
